Atty. Rivera then organized a group and proceeded to the store within the night of the same day. In the evening of March 17, 2010, Atty. We once more disagree. As we see it, Atty. Id. at 27-28; see Annex "G". Id. at 10, 43-52; see Annex "N". Id. at 10, 53-56; see Annex "O". Id. at 8, 29; see Annex "H". Id. at 1, 16; see Annex "B". Id. at 85, 107; see Annex "4". Id. at 7, 22-25; see Annex "E". Id. at 8, 30-34; see Annex "I". Id. at 2, 16; see id. Id. at 7, 26; see Annex "F". Id. at 15; see Annex "A". RESOLVED to Adopt and APPROVE, as it's hereby ADOPTED and Approved, with modification, the Report and Recommendation of the Investigating Commissioner in the above-entitled case, herein made part of this Resolution as Annex "A," and finding the suggestion absolutely supported by the proof on report and the relevant laws, and for gross violation of Rule 6.02 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, Atty. More importantly, Risie's recourse from the alleged acts of Atty.

Meanwhile, on May 18, 2010, the Municipal Treasurer issued one other Closure Order (Second Closure Order) in opposition to Risie's father for failure to pay the fines and penalties in relation to the March 17, 2010 operation. Meanwhile, an altercation ensued between Rodolfo and R. Collantes, a member of Atty. This prompted Risie and her father to file numerous circumstances against Atty. A judicious evaluation of the allegations of Risie failed to indicate that Atty. Next, the IBP recommends that Atty. The Court disagrees with the findings and recommendation of the IBP. In his Report and Recommendation dated June 25, 2013, Investigating Commissioner Michael G. Fabunan noted that (a) there was no cause for Atty. Finally, it has not escaped our consideration that the Baygars already filed an administrative complaint in opposition to Atty. Atty. Rivera additional explains that the criminal case for Violation of Municipal Ordinance No. 2006-006 was filed in opposition to both Risie and Rodolfo as they had been in violation of the ordinance in operating companies without the required enterprise permits. Risie then proceeded to Atty. Atty. Rivera claims that Risie has distorted the reality to swimsuit her purpose of continuously harassing him when she felt aggrieved by the processes of the municipality in implementing the local tax ordinance.

Risie claims that the officers should have merely locked the institution without seizing the items because the closure order did not give them authority to do so. Rivera's group, as Rodolfo did not need to give up the objects that have been being seized. Rivera's office and requested for the discharge of the seized objects. To stress, Atty. Rivera's acts couldn't be considered as violations of the Lawyer's Oath and the CPR. Rivera committed acts in violation of the Lawyer's Oath and the CPR. Rivera committed acts constitutive of a Violation of the Lawyer's Oath and the CPR. Rivera dedicated acts constitutive of a Violation of the Lawyer's Oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility (CPR). Rivera filed a criminal complaint against them for Violation of Municipal Ordinance No. 2006-006 for operating a business without securing a enterprise permit. Instead of heeding his recommendation, Risie and her father Rodolfo filed various criminal and administrative instances towards him, together with this Petition for Disbarment.

In her Petition, Risie alleges that Atty. Atty. Rivera alleges that it was Carina who changed the date and added the phrase "w/ BILLIARD" within the Closure Order. When she returned the Closure Order back to them, the enforcers modified the date and added the phrase "w/ BILLIARD". Moreover, the billiard desk was not initially included within the scope of the closure order and was added only in the course of the operation. On March 22, 2010, Risie and her father secured the required business permits for the sari-sari store, videoke machine, and billiard table. Then, Risie and her father had been stunned when they realized that Atty. Based on the IBP, it was error on the part of Atty. In line with the Saratoga Wire, in 2010 Tavarez plead responsible to misdemeanor third-diploma assault as a part of a plea deal, after allegedly smashing a plate over a man's head inside Compton's Restaurant on Broadway in December of 2010. The deal dismissed two felony charges that had been introduced towards him under the hate crimes statute. We disagree. Whether to incorporate Risie or not in the cost is purely discretionary on the part of Atty. In any event, it is the prosecutor who will ultimately determine whether to incorporate or drop Risie from the charge.