build an mvp estimate that arrives instantly should be treated as a red flag rather than good service. A competent dedicated php development team responds with a list of questions: about integrations. A supplier that prices without asking anything is simply guessing, and that guess will be corrected later — and you will pay for it.
Be wary of any distance difference between flutter and react native the team in the pitch and the developers actually assigned. Request the names and CVs of the actual team software development company in russia the statement of work, with a provision about substitutions. A team that will only describe roles and never names individuals is reserving its own flexibility at your cost.
Require commit-level visibility from the start. A partner that shows code only at milestones is inviting you to take delivery on faith. Regular commits and pull requests show you the actual pace far better than any status report. The same holds for the automated test suite: if there is no pipeline, quality claims remain nothing more than words.
Loose wording in the contract around code ownership is rarely an accident. The contract must state plainly that all deliverables become the property of your business on payment. Look too at the governing law and the milestone terms: a request for most of the money up front with no deliverable attached eliminates any leverage you would otherwise keep.
Finally, examine communication. Establish what overlap there will be with your timezone, which named person is expected to answer questions and within what time. Some genuine overlap is normally sufficient; no overlap stretches every clarification into a lost day. Careless writing in the early emails rarely improves once the work starts.
